_____________________________________________
(Your name and Date)
Assessment Questionnaire
For the
COMPUTER ENGINEERING PROGRAM (08/28/2007)
A group of professional
engineering organizations, including the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (ABET), has requested that each ABET accredited institution
perform an outcomes assessment of its undergraduate programs. Since the
assessment is in conjunction with our ABET accreditation, it is mandatory. Completing the questionnaire
should not take you more that 30 minutes. We thank you in advance for your
cooperation.
The questions are presented
in three parts. The first part concerns the goals of engineering education, the
second part concerns your assessment of the quality of the faculty, students,
facilities and institutional support, and the third part is devoted to your
immediate and long‑term professional goals. You are requested to encircle
numerical ratings. Additional written comments on each question are strongly encouraged.
I. Outcomes of the CE Program
Please state the level to which you have attained the
following as a result of your education at Johns
4 = highly developed
3 = substantially developed
2 = moderately developed
1 = slightly developed
0 = undeveloped.
1. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
2. Ability
to apply knowledge of science
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
3. Ability to apply knowledge of engineering
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
4. Ability to design experiments
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
5. Ability
to conduct experiments
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
6. Ability to analyze data
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
7. Ability to interpret data
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
8. Ability to design a system to meet desired
needs
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
9. Ability
to design a component to meet desired needs
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
10. Ability
to design within environmental constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
11. Ability to design within
social constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
12. Ability
to design within political constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
13. Ability
to design within ethical constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
14. Ability to design within health and safety
constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
15. Ability to design within manufacturability
constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
16. Ability to design within sustainability
constraints
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
17. Ability to function on
multidisciplinary teams
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
18. Ability to identify engineering
problems
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
19. Ability to formulate engineering
problems
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
20. Ability to solve engineering problems
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
21. Understanding of professional responsibility
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
22. Understanding of ethical responsibility
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
23. Ability to communicate orally
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
24. Ability to communicate in writing
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
25. Ability to understand the impact of
engineering solutions in a global context
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
26. Ability to understand the impact of
engineering solutions in an economic context
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
27. Ability to understand the impact of
engineering solutions in an environmental context
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
28. Recognition of the need for life-long
learning
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
29. Ability to engage in life-long learning
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
30. Knowledge of the relationship between
technology and society
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
31. Ability to use the techniques, skills, and
modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
II. Advising
4 = exceeded
3 = met
2 = mostly met
1 = somewhat met
0 = not met.
Please rate your level of satisfaction
with the quality of advising that you received from
1. Your 1st
major department (faculty advisor, website, manuals, coordinators, etc.) on
course
selection
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
2. Your 1st
major department on post-graduation employment
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
3. Your 1st major department on
graduate education
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
4. The Engineering Advising Office (
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
5.
The Engineering Advising Office on course selection
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
6. The
Engineering Advising Office on post-graduation employment
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
7.
The Engineering Advising Office on graduate education
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
8.
The
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
9. The
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
10. The
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
11. The
Pre-Professional Advising Office on major selection
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
12. The
Pre-Professional Advising Office on post-graduation employment
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
13. The
Pre-Professional Advising Office on graduate education
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
14.
JHU (overall) on course selection
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
15. JHU
(overall) on major selection
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
16. JHU
(overall) on post-graduation employment
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
17. JHU (overall) on graduate education
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
.
III. Facilities
4 = exceeded
3 = met
2 = mostly met
1 = somewhat met
0 = not met.
Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements:
1. The
classroom facilities were adequate
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
2. The
laboratory facilities were adequate
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
3. Computing
facilities were adequate
|
4
3 2 1
0 |
4. Classrooms provided an environment
conducive to learning
|
4
3 2 1
0 |